Abstract

Protein degradation in bacteria is a highly controlled process involving proteolytic adaptors that regulate protein degradation during cell cycle progression or during stress responses. Many adaptors work as scaffolds that selectively bind cargo and tether substrates to their cognate proteases to promote substrate destruction, whereas others primarily activate the target protease. Because adaptors must bind their cognate protease, all adaptors run the risk of being recognized by the protease as substrates themselves, a process that could limit their effectiveness. Here we use purified proteins in a reconstituted system and in vivo studies to show that adaptors of the ClpXP protease are readily degraded but that cargo binding inhibits this degradation. We found that this principle extends across several adaptor systems, including the hierarchical adaptors that drive the Caulobacter bacterial cell cycle and the quality control adaptor SspB. We also found that the ability of a cargo to protect its adaptor is adaptor substrate-specific, as adaptors with artificial degradation tags were not protected even though cargo binding is unaffected. Our work points to an optimization of inherent adaptor degradation and cargo binding that ensures that robust adaptor activity is maintained when high amounts of substrate must be delivered and that adaptors can be eliminated when their tasks have been completed.

Highlights

  • Protein degradation in bacteria is a highly controlled process involving proteolytic adaptors that regulate protein degradation during cell cycle progression or during stress responses

  • We found that this principle extends across several adaptor systems, including the hierarchical adaptors that drive the Caulobacter bacterial cell cycle and the quality control adaptor SspB

  • We found that the ability of a cargo to protect its adaptor is adaptor substrate-specific, as adaptors with artificial degradation tags were not protected even though cargo binding is unaffected

Read more

Summary

Results

We previously identified RcdA as an adaptor that delivers multiple cell cycle regulators exclusively to a CpdR-primed ClpXP [15]. Translation shutoff experiments suggested that these increased levels are due to loss of RcdA degradation in ⌬cpdR strains (Fig. 1, D and E) Together, these data show that the RcdA adaptor is degraded by ClpXP in a CpdR-dependent manner both in vivo and in vitro. RcdA ends in GG, a dipeptide sequence shown previously to be able to be recognized by ClpX in appropriately presented substrates [20] We mutated these residues to make an RcdADD variant that was fully capable of delivering cargo substrates in a CpdR-dependent manner (Fig. 2H and supplemental Fig. S1B) but was substantially resistant to degradation compared with wild-type RcdA (Fig. 2, F and G). This allele supported CtrA degradation in vivo similar to wild-type RcdA (supplemental Fig. S1D) but was markedly stabilized (supplemental Fig. S1C), consistent with the in vitro results

RcdA adaptor degradation is suppressed upon cargo binding
Discussion
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
Molecular cloning and generation of chimeric constructs
Protein expression and purification
In vivo and in vitro protein degradation assays
Immunoblot analysis
In vitro pulldown assays
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call