Abstract

Abstract Background Addressing all modifiable risk factors in a composite manner, instead of treating individual risk factors is the current approach in the management of cardiovascular diseases. In patients, attending chronic disease clinic in Urban Health Centre (UHC) functioning under a tertiary care teaching hospital, this study aims to assess 10-year cardiovascular risk using ‘WHO/ISH Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Charts’ and ‘Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Profile using lipid levels’ and compare the level of agreement between the results obtained. Methodology A retrospective record review was carried out in urban chronic disease clinic during the months of May and June 2013. Records of 280 patients attending the Urban Health Centre were screened using a structured proforma and 180 of them were included subject to selection criteria. The analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS v 21. 10-year cardiovascular risk was calculated using the joint WHO/ISH charts and the General Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Profile charts. Level of agreement between the risk scores was compared using kappa statistics. Institution ethics committee approval was obtained before starting the project. Results 81.7% of the patients were women with a median age of 58 years. Less than half of the patients (45%) had hypertension and another 37.2% had both diabetes and hypertension. 71.6% of the patients had a Conclusion Framingham Risk Profile was found to identify more patients as belonging to the higher risk category as compared to WHO/ISH charts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call