Abstract
The cardiovascular changes which follow the intravascular injection of a contrast medium are indicative of its toxicity (4). Those that occur after intracardiac injection of contrast material, both experimentally (2, 6, 15) and clinically (3, 6), have been well documented. Information is lacking, however, concerning these responses when angiographic medium is injected directly into the proximal aorta. Two major differences exist between the two technics, which may be responsible for significant variations in the reactions produced by each. First, in proximal aortography, there is direct perfusion of the myocardium, via the coronary arteries, by relatively undiluted contrast medium. Second, in this technic, since there is normally no passage of the contrast medium through the cardiac chambers or the pulmonary circulation, there can be no direct action on these structures. The value of thoracic aortography as a diagnostic means is now well established (1). The increasing use of this procedure makes it manda...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.