Abstract

BackgroundAortic Atheroma (AoA) is an independent risk factor for new and recurrent stroke. AoA ulceration and mobility are associated with an increased risk for brain embolism. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard for detection and measurement of AoA in stroke/TIA patients. Cardiovascular MRI (cMRI) could be an alternative, non-invasive imaging modality for stroke/TIA patients. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and correlation of AoA detected and measured by cMRI versus TEE in patients with recent stroke/TIA.Methods and resultsTwenty-two stroke/TIA patients undergoing TEE as a part of their stroke workup consented to a protocol-mandated cMRI performed on a 1.5 T magnet. The protocol included an axial non-breathhold EKG-gated dual-echo spin echo MRI of the thoracic aorta (TR/TE1/TE2=900/29/69) and a contrast-enhanced breathhold 3D gradient-echo image of the thorax (flip/TR/TE=12/4.0/1.71). Maximum plaque thickness, ulceration (≥ 2 mm) and mobility of AoA were assessed in the proximal (ascending and proximal arch) and distal (distal arch and descending) segments of thoracic aorta by a cardiologist to interpret the TEE and a radiologist to interpret the cMRI. There was good correlation between cMRI and TEE in measurement of plaque thickness in the proximal segments (R=0.73, p<0.0001) and the distal segments (R=0.81, p<0.0001) of the aortic arch (AA). cMRI had a high degree of accuracy in detecting measurable AoA (≥ 1 mm) in the proximal segments (sensitivity 90%, specificity 100%), as well as the distal segments (sensitivity 67%, specificity 100%). cMRI also had a high degree of accuracy in detecting significant AoA (≥ 4 mm) in proximal segments (sensitivity 71%, specificity 93%), as well as distal segments (sensitivity 71%, specificity 100%).ConclusionThe study showed a high degree of accuracy and correlation of AoA detected and measured by cMRI as compared to TEE in patients with recent stroke/TIA. This technique has limitations in detection of AoA ulceration, and protocols assessing AoA mobility need to be developed.

Highlights

  • By any measure, the impact of stroke in the developed world is substantial

  • The study showed a high degree of accuracy and correlation of AoA detected and measured by Cardiovascular Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (cMRI) as compared to Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with recent stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)

  • This study proposes to analyze whether MRI can be useful to investigate embolic potential from proximal and distal aortic arch

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The impact of stroke in the developed world is substantial. In the U.S, stroke is the fourth leading cause of death and a primary cause of significant disability [1]. Proximal aortic arch (PAA) atheroma plaques are seen in 16-20% of stroke/TIA patients [7]. The disease burden in proximal DAA has been demonstrated to be a frequent source of stroke via retrograde flow by Harloff et al in 2010 [14]. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is routinely requested in patients with cryptogenic stroke in order to identify a potential embolic source; it is moderately invasive and not tolerated by all patients. This study proposes to analyze whether MRI can be useful to investigate embolic potential from proximal and distal aortic arch. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard for detection and measurement of AoA in stroke/TIA patients. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and correlation of AoA detected and measured by cMRI versus TEE in patients with recent stroke/TIA

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call