Abstract

The cardiovascular effects of non-abdominal and abdominal surgery during isoflurane anaesthesia (A-group) or isoflurane anaesthesia supplemented with either epidural ropivacaine (AR-group; 0.75 % solution, 0.2 ml/kg) or morphine (AM-group; 0.1 mg/kg diluted in saline to 0.2 ml/kg) were evaluated in 28 healthy pigs with a mean body weight of 30.3 kg SD +/- 4.1 during surgical devascularisation of the liver. Anaesthesia was induced with the intramuscular injection of midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and ketamine (10 mg/kg). Anaesthesia was deepened with intravenous propofol to enable tracheal intubation and maintained with isoflurane on a circle rebreathing circuit. The vaporiser was set at 2.5% for the A-group and 1.5% for the AR- and AM-groups. Differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) for any of the variables. Differences between AM- and AR-groups were marginally significant heart rate (HR) (P = 0.06) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (P = 0.08). Within treatment groups, differences for the A-group were statistically significant (P < 0.05) between non-abdominal and abdominal surgery for HR, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure (DIA) and MAP. Within the AM-group differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05) for DIA and MAE and within the AR group differences for all variables were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). It was concluded that in isoflurane-anaesthetised pigs, the epidural administration of ropivacaine decreased heart rate and improved arterial blood pressure during surgery.

Highlights

  • Adverse effects associated with surgery with particular reference to the stress response may be reduced by the use of either spinal/epidural anaesthesia[8,9,28] or the local infiltration of lidocaine and bupivacaine before laparotomy[16]

  • Possible measures to reduce perioperative hypotension were to replace the local anaesthetic with an opioid during epidural anaesthesia and pre-induction fluid administration[18]

  • Each treatment was administered in a block, i.e. 10 pigs for isoflurane anaesthesia only (A-group), 10 pigs for anaesthesia plus ropivacaine epidural (AR-group) and 8 pigs for anaesthesia plus morphine epidural (AM-group)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adverse effects associated with surgery with particular reference to the stress response may be reduced by the use of either spinal/epidural anaesthesia[8,9,28] or the local infiltration of lidocaine and bupivacaine before laparotomy[16]. Possible measures to reduce perioperative hypotension were to replace the local anaesthetic with an opioid during epidural anaesthesia and pre-induction fluid administration[18]. Epidural local anaesthetics block nociceptive (sensory), motor and autonomic (sympathetic) pathways whereas opioids such as morphine only affect the nociceptive component of sympathetic activation[18]. Analgesic effects of local anaesthetics may result from the spinal root blockade of sensory nerves and from systemic effects after epidural absorption[8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.