Abstract
Comparative data on heart rate, blood pressure, and motor response in dogs, indicate that cardiovascular conditioning as exhibited by heart rate and blood pressure changes is more reliable than motor conditioning. While blood pressures obtained by the ausculatory method are equivalent to those obtained by the direct method in intact dogs, the former may lead to certain errors in the interpretation of conditioning results because of the time required to secure accurate readings.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
