Abstract

There was no statistically significant difference in cardiac output between vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Central venous pressure was lower in cesarean section than vaginal deliveries at all points after anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure is lower in cesarean section than vaginal deliveries at all points after anesthesia. All values were within normal range. Mean circulation time was longer in the vaginal delivery group than the cesarean section group at Point F, the end of the procedure. Total peripheral resistance was less in the cesarean section group than the vaginal group, only at Point B, after administration of the anesthesia. None of the differences in the parameters measured would imply that cesarean section imposes a greater cardiac stress than vaginal delivery. This study indicates that cardiac strain is very similar in vaginal and abdominal delivery. Therefore, the length and type of labor should be a primary consideration in the pregnant cardiac patient.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.