Abstract

BackgroundThere is considerable controversy over the benefits of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). The aim of the study was to research the effects of RAS blockade on allograft and patient outcome. MethodsA retrospective analysis of the effects of RAS blockade on allograft and patient outcome in 53 pairs of RTRs receiving grafts from the same donor was performed. The 106 RTRs (53 pairs), transplanted from 2002 to 2012, were included in the study when 1 patient from the pair used an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) for a minimum period of 36 months (RAS[+]) and the second one did not use it (RAS[−]). ResultsThere were no differences between RAS(+) and RAS(−) subjects in terms of age, body mass index, reason of end-stage renal disease, mismatches number, total ischemic time, episodes of cytomegalovirus infections, acute rejections, and immunosuppressive treatment. The mean time of observations was 66.28 months ± 24.39 months. RAS inhibitors were given in a mean dose of 23.1% (ACEI) and 27.08% (ARB) of the maximum recommended. The main reasons for the therapy were as follows: hypertension (39.62%), nephroprotection/proteinuria (39.62%), and polyglobulia (28.3%). The composite cardiorenal endpoint was reached by 6 (11.32%) and 7 (13.21%) patients in RAS(+) and RAS(−) group, respectively. There were no differences in changes of creatinine, potassium serum level, or estimated glomerular filtration rate between RAS(+) and RAS(−) patients in the early period after RAS blockade commencement. ConclusionAgents inhibiting the RAS system neither improved nor deteriorated patients and graft survival in RTRs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call