Abstract

BackgroundCardiotoxicity remains an important concern in drug discovery. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) have become an attractive platform to evaluate cardiotoxicity. However, the consistency between human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) in prediction of cardiotoxicity has yet to be elucidated.MethodsHere we screened the toxicities of four representative drugs (E-4031, isoprenaline, quinidine, and haloperidol) using both hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs, combined with an impedance-based bioanalytical method.ResultsIt showed that both hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs can recapitulate cardiotoxicity and identify the effects of well-characterized compounds.ConclusionsThe combined platform of hPSC-CMs and an impedance-based bioanalytical method could improve preclinical cardiotoxicity screening, holding great potential for increasing drug development accuracy.

Highlights

  • Cardiotoxicity remains an important concern in drug discovery

  • Current in vitro cardiotoxicity screenings rely on the artificial expression of a single hERG channel in Chinese hamster ovary or human embryonic kidney cells, based on the two guidelines International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) S7B and ICH E14 [4, 5]

  • In combination with state-of-the-art bioanalytical methods, hESC-CMs have been reported as an alternative model for in vitro cardiotoxicity [6, 7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiotoxicity remains an important concern in drug discovery. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) have become an attractive platform to evaluate cardiotoxicity. Methods: Here we screened the toxicities of four representative drugs (E-4031, isoprenaline, quinidine, and haloperidol) using both hESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs, combined with an impedance-based bioanalytical method. Conclusions: The combined platform of hPSC-CMs and an impedance-based bioanalytical method could improve preclinical cardiotoxicity screening, holding great potential for increasing drug development accuracy. In combination with state-of-the-art bioanalytical methods, hESC-CMs have been reported as an alternative model for in vitro cardiotoxicity [6, 7]. Navarrete and colleagues [8] reported that hiPSC-CMs can recapitulate drug-induced arrhythmias. HESC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs have been reported possessing comparable ultrastructural features [9], their responses to identical compounds have not been systemically compared. The xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analysis (RTCA) Cardio system, which utilizes impedance technology to quantify CM-beating properties, has been previously reported as an emerging method to quantify cardiac contractility [10]. We compared the capacity of hESC- and hiPSC-CMs for prediction of

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call