Cardioneuroablation for asystolic reflex syncope with or without the use of extra cardiac vagal stimulation-one year follow-up results

Abstract

Abstract Background Extra-Cardiac Vagal Stimulation (ECVS) during cardioneuroablation (CNA) has been introduced to confirm total vagal denervation – a clear intra-procedural end-point. However, whether the use of ECVS is associated with better outcome than simple intra-procedural assessment of CNA-induced changes in basic ECG parameters, has not been established. Purpose To compare one-year efficacy of CNA performed with versus without ECVS. Methods This retrospective analysis included 90 patients (age: 37±12 years, 39 males) divided into 2 groups: ECVS(+) (n=41, general anesthesia and total muscle relaxation, settings: 50 Hz, 0.05 ms, 1 V/kg (<70V) for 5 s) and ECVS(-) group (n=49, light sedation). CNA strategy was the same in all patients and was based on presumed anatomical localization of ganglionated plexi, combined with identification of ablation targets at sites with fragmented bipolar atrial electrograms. The end-point in the ECVS (+) group was complete vagal denervation, confirmed by ECVS, whereas in the ECVS (-) group - significant (>30%) acceleration of sinus rate. The primary endpoint was syncope recurrence during one-year follow-up. Results Both groups were comparable concerning clinical and demographic parameters. Primary endpoint occurred in 4 (10%) patients in the ECVS(+) group and in 7 (14%) patients in the ECVS(-) group (p=0.7481) (Figure). No complications were reported. Conclusions These preliminary results suggest that the use of ECVS only slightly improves the one-year CNA efficacy, however, prospective larger studies and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these initial findings.