Abstract
A comparative cohort study was designed. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) tools were used to determine the outcome variables. Association studies were done using logistic regression. CMetS was found to have a greater point and period prevalence, and incidence estimation in HIV-negative than HIV+ patients using both the NCEP and the IDF tools. Using the NCEP tool, the risk of obesity was 44.1% [odds ratio (OR) = 0.559, 95% confidence interval (CI), (0.380-0.824); P = 0.003] lower in HIV+ than in HIV-negative participants. By contrast, no apparent difference was noted using the IDF tool. Similarly, hyperglycemia [OR = 0.651, 95% CI (0.457-0.926); P = 0.017], and hypertension [OR = 0.391, 95% CI (0.271-0.563); P < 0.001] were shown to be lower in HIV+ patients than HIV-negative patients by 34.9% and 60.9%, respectively. The study revealed significant variation in all biomarkers across the follow-up period in both HIV+ and HIV-negative participants, except for SBP. CMetS caused more overall disruption in HIV-negative people with chronic diseases than in HIV-positive people. All of the indicators used to assess the increased risk of CMetS were equally meaningful in HIV+ and HIV-negative subjects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.