Abstract

Objective: Several epidemiological studies suggest that the preservation of the physiological circadian rhythm of blood pressure or its disruption affects the extent of the organ damage developed by the patient. If we classify the circadian rhythm of blood pressure into four nocturnal profiles, significant differences emerge in terms of organ damage burden and prognosis: reverse dippers have the worst prognosis while dippers and mild dippers fall into an intermediate risk range. The risk profile of extreme dippers is still debated, and the available data are very conflicting and inconclusive. Starting from this gap of knowledge, we aimed to evaluate, retrospectively, in a cohort of hypertensive subjects, the degree of cardiac involvement in relation to the different nocturnal blood pressure profiles. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 900 patients with essential hypertension, of whom 510 met our study criteria. We graded the 510 patients in relation to the percentage of reduction in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) at night-time compared with day-time, considering this as a continuous variable, and then compared the extreme quintiles with each other and with the middle quintile (considered as reference). Results: Patients with less (or no) reduction in nocturnal SBP (reverse dipper) showed a higher level of organ damage and comorbidities. With regard to echocardiographic indexes, patients with maximum nocturnal pressure reduction (extreme dipper) showed a lower level of remodeling and/or impairment of E/e’ ratio, Right Atrium Area, Basal Right Ventricular Diameter, Inferior Vena Cava Average Diameter, and Tricuspidal Anular Plane Systolic Excursion compared also with hypertensive patients with a physiological nocturnal pressure reduction, even after correction for the main confounders. Conclusions: These data suggest that extreme dippers may constitute the subgroup of hypertensive patients with the lowest 24-h pressure load and, therefore, less cardiac remodeling.

Highlights

  • Blood pressure (BP) has a physiological circadian rhythm known for many decades [1]

  • When diurnal and nocturnal ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) were included in the same models, average nocturnal ABP was superior to diurnal in predicting stroke events as well as all causes and cardiovascular mortality [3,4]

  • The analysis showed a linear correlation between ∆ mean systolic blood pressure (SBP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Blood pressure (BP) has a physiological circadian rhythm known for many decades [1]. The physiological fluctuation of BP values over 24 h is usually hallmarked by higher levels during day-time and a 10% to 20% fall during night-time. The level of organ damage and the risk of vascular events appear to be significantly influenced by the extent of nocturnal BP reduction [2]. The night-time ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) predicts the outcome of hypertensive patients much better than diurnal. When diurnal and nocturnal ABP were included in the same models, average nocturnal ABP was superior to diurnal in predicting stroke events as well as all causes and cardiovascular mortality [3,4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call