Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking correlates with natural radial strain and corresponds to inotropic stimulation

Abstract

Summary We have demonstrated that cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial feature tracking (FT) and natural radial strain correlate and correspond to inotropic stimulation. CMR-FT has the potential for quantitative wall motion assessment at rest and during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance (DSMR) imaging. Background CMR-FT is a recently introduced technique for tissue voxel motion tracking on standard steady-state free precession (SSFP) images to derive radial myocardial mechanics. CMR-FT has the potential to facilitate DSMR analysis however has not yet been compared to external reference standards (with stress) such as SSFP derived natural radial strain. Methods 10 healthy subjects were studied at 1.5 Tesla. LV shortaxis radial strain ErrSAX was derived from SSFP cine images using dedicated CMR-FT software (Diogenes MRI prototype, Tomtec, Germany) at rest and during dobutamine stress (10 and 20 μg * kg-1* min-1). Natural radial strain values (loge [End-systolic wall thickness/ end-diastolic wall thickness]) were calculated in identical segments as analysed for ErrSAX using commercially available software (Philips View Forum, The Netherlands). 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the difference and p-values were calculated to compare the 2 techniques. Results In all volunteers strain parameters could be derived from the SSFP images at rest and stress. ErrSAX values showed significantly increased contraction with DSMR (rest: 19.6±14.6; 10 μg: 31.8±20.9; 20 μg: 42.4±25.5, p<0.05). Natural radial strain values increased with dobutamine (rest: 24±8.9; 10 μg: 36.5±8.9; 20 μg: 44.2 ±8.5, p<0.05). There was reasonable agreement between mean ErrSAX and natural radial strain at rest and with dobutamine stress (figure 1 and table 1) as determined by 95% CI of the difference. Conclusions