Abstract

Cardioneuroablation is an emerging therapy for refractory vasovagal syncope (VVS), but the standard enrollment criterion is undetermined. Mainstream studies empirically enroll patients with cardioinhibitory and mixed types of VVS on the basis of the head-up tilt (HUT). However, a variety of studies have shown that the results of HUT exhibit unpleasant reproducibility. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of baseline deceleration capacity in patients with refractory VVS after cardioneuroablation. This study enrolled 123 patients (mean age 42.2±17.7 years; 54 males [43.9%]) with the diagnosis of VVS, of whom 16 patients had a negative result of HUT (13.0%), 8 (6.5%) had vasodepressive VVS, 32 (26.0%) cardioinhibitory VVS, and 67 (54.5%) mixed VVS. All patients underwent cardioneuroablation that was performed in the left atrium. After a mean follow-up of 4.0±1.1 years, 33 patients experienced syncope/presyncope events (26.8%). Patients with recurrent syncope/presyncope have a lower baseline deceleration capacity level than do those without (8.9±3.2 ms vs 11.3±3.7 ms; P < .001). Each 1-ms increase in deceleration capacity had a 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12%-50%) reduced risk of syncope/presyncope recurrence after cardioneuroablation. Nighttime deceleration capacity had the highest discrimination value (area under the curve 0.757; 95% confidence interval 0.657-0.858). At a high-risk threshold of 51% (nighttime deceleration capacity at a cutoff of 9.9 ms), the nighttime deceleration capacity enrollment strategy additionally benefited 18 per 100 patients after cardioneuroablation without syncope/presyncope recurrence as compared with the HUT strategy in decision curve analyses. Baseline nighttime deceleration capacity ≥ 10 ms may act as an indication for cardioneuroablation in patients with refractory VVS.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call