Abstract
In the present study we tested the hypothesis that learned irrelevance underlies the frequently observed poor performance of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients on card sorting tests. If learned irrelevance accounts for the poor performance of PD patients on card sorting tests, PD patients and control subjects (CS) will not differ in the acquisition phase, during which basic concept formation is assessed, but they will differ in the subsequent shifting phases. We presented three distinct card sorting tests with an identical format to 51 PD patients and 24 normal controls. The groups did not differ with respect to intelligence, memory, or attention. PD patients showed a slightly better performance in the acquisition phase. In the first shifting phase, the performance of PD patients was significantly poorer than that of control subjects after correction for basic concept formation. In the second shifting phase this difference disappeared. We conclude that learned irrelevance does not account for the poor performance of PD patients in card sorting tests. The results are discussed in terms of self-generation of problem solving strategies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
