Abstract

Abstract. We simulated elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) aerosols in China and compared model results to surface measurements at Chinese rural and background sites, with the goal of deriving "top-down" emission estimates of EC and OC, as well as better quantifying the secondary sources of OC. We included in the model state-of-the-science Chinese "bottom-up" emission inventories for EC (1.92 TgC yr−1) and OC (3.95 TgC yr−1), as well as updated secondary OC formation pathways. The average simulated annual mean EC concentration at rural and background sites was 1.1 μgC m−3, 56% lower than the observed 2.5 μgC m−3. The average simulated annual mean OC concentration at rural and background sites was 3.4 μgC m−3, 76% lower than the observed 14 μgC m−3. Multiple regression to fit surface monthly mean EC observations at rural and background sites yielded the best estimate of Chinese EC source of 3.05 ± 0.78 TgC yr−1. Based on the top-down EC emission estimate and observed seasonal primary OC/EC ratios, we estimated Chinese OC emissions to be 6.67 ± 1.30 TgC yr−1. Using these top-down estimates, the simulated average annual mean EC concentration at rural and background sites was significantly improved to 1.9 μgC m−3. However, the model still significantly underestimated observed OC in all seasons (simulated average annual mean OC at rural and background sites was 5.4 μgC m−3), with little skill in capturing the spatiotemporal variability. Secondary formation accounts for 21% of Chinese annual mean surface OC in the model, with isoprene being the most important precursor. In summer, as high as 62% of the observed surface OC may be due to secondary formation in eastern China. Our analysis points to four shortcomings in the current bottom-up inventories of Chinese carbonaceous aerosols: (1) the anthropogenic source is underestimated on a national scale, particularly for OC; (2) the spatiotemporal distributions of emissions are misrepresented; (3) there is a missing source in western China, likely associated with the use of biofuels or other low-quality fuels for heating; and (4) sources in fall are not well represented, either because the seasonal shifting of emissions and/or secondary formation are poorly captured or because specific fall emission events are missing. In addition, secondary production of OC in China is severely underestimated. More regional measurements with better spatiotemporal coverage are needed to resolve these shortcomings.

Highlights

  • Carbonaceous aerosols, including elemental carbon aerosol (EC) and organic carbon aerosol (OC), are important components of atmospheric particulate matter, affecting air quality and climate

  • Model performance at Dunhuang and Gaolanshan was worse for OC than for EC, during cold months, suggesting that a source associated with a high OC/EC emission ratio is missing in the bottom-up inventories

  • The variability of rural OC away from the urban OC versus EC regression line reflects additional secondary production not represented in the model or primary OC sources not represented in the bottom-up inventories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carbonaceous aerosols, including elemental carbon aerosol (EC) and organic carbon aerosol (OC), are important components of atmospheric particulate matter, affecting air quality and climate. Z. Han et al (2008) used the anthropogenic and biomass burning emission inventories developed by Streets et al (2003a, b) to simulate summertime primary and secondary carbonaceous aerosols in eastern China. They compared model results against surface observations at 14 urban and 3 rural sites in summer 2003 and found both EC and OC to be underestimated at almost all sites. The simulated results were compared to seasonal surface observations at background and rural sites in China to derive “top-down” estimates for the primary EC and OC sources and to quantify the secondary formation of OC

GEOS-Chem model
Carbonaceous aerosol measurements
Model evaluation
Background
EC emission estimates
OC emission estimates
Evaluation of the “top-down” emission estimates
Contribution of secondary formation to OC
Comparison with previous studies
Method
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call