Abstract
AbstractOur study examines the link between firms' carbon emissions and their compensation to CEOs and finds a positive association in line with the compensating wage differentials theory. We use Donald Trump's 2016 election win as an exogenous shock to identify a causal relationship. Ruling out managerial power as an alternative explanation, the relations are stronger when firms are better governed and are more likely to be aware of their carbon risk. Additionally, we present evidence that high carbon emissions increase CEOs' risk of job loss, reinforcing the presence of compensating wage differentials as the plausible explanation for the positive association.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
