Abstract
In this work, a techno-economic assessment of carbon dioxide capture from limekiln flue gas of a pulp and paper mill (Mill A) and a linerboard mill (Mill B) using a Monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption desorption process was carried out. We coupled the ASPEN Plus simulator with a derivative-free optimization (DFO) tool to identify the optimal configuration for minimizing the total capture cost. The capture costs were calculated using CAPCOST, a modular program for equipment cost estimation, and appropriate coefficients. Eight degrees of freedom, the direct contact cooler stages, the absorber stages, the stripper stages, the solvent lean loading, the solvent weight concentration, the stripper inlet temperature, the flue gas inlet temperature, and the amount of CO2 captured, were selected for process and flowsheet optimization. Additionally, we evaluated the effect of steam integration and Sect. 45Q of the existing federal tax credit for carbon capture and sequestration on CO2 capture costs. The total capture costs per tonne of CO2 were $64.9 for Mill A and $69.7 for Mill B. When steam integration and Sect. 45Q are considered, the costs dropped to − $2.5 and $2.6 for Mill A and Mill B, respectively. The sensitivity of CO2 capture cost to changes in the inlet flue gas flowrate, flue gas CO2 mol%, and the electricity and MEA prices were investigated. The sensitivity analysis results revealed that the capture costs vary from − $5.9 to $5.9 per tonne of CO2 captured.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.