Abstract
Most Earth system models (ESMs) do not explicitly represent the carbon (C) costs of plant nutrient acquisition, which leads to uncertainty in predictions of the current and future constraints to the land C sink. While plants acquire nutrients through different uptake pathways, such as from mycorrhizae, direct root uptake, retranslocation from senescing tissues, and biological fixation in the case of nitrogen (N), they usually have different associated C costs. Determining the amount of nutrients acquired through each uptake pathway and the associated C cost could increase understanding of the global C and nutrient cycles, as well as the predictive skills of ESMs.Here, we integrate a plant productivity-optimizing nutrient (N and phosphorus (P)) acquisition model (Fixation & Uptake of Nutrients, FUN) into the Energy Exascale Earth System (E3SM) Land Model (ELM) to simulate the global C and nutrient cycles (Braghiere et al., 2022). We benchmarked the model with observations (in-situ, remotely sensed, and integrated using artificial intelligence), and other ESMs from CMIP6; we found significant improvements in present C cycle variables estimates. We also examine the impact of mycorrhizal spatial distributions on the global C cycle, since most plant species predominantly associate with a single type of mycorrhizal fungi and uncertainties in mycorrhizal distributions are non-trivial, with current estimates disagreeing in up to 50% over 40% of the land area (Braghiere et al., 2021). Global Net Primary Productivity (NPP) is reduced by 20% with N costs and 50% with NP costs, while modeled and observed nutrient limitation agreement increases when N and P are considered together. Even though NPP has been growing globally in response to increasing CO2, as soil nutrient progressively becomes more limiting, the costs to NPP for nutrient acquisition have increased at a faster rate. This suggests that nutrient acquisition will increasingly demand a higher portion of assimilated C to support the same productivity.Braghiere, et al. (2022) doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003204Braghiere, et al. (2021) doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094514
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.