Carbon budget estimation based on different methods of CO2 storage flux in forest ecosystems

Abstract

Accurate measurement of CO2 storage flux (Fs) in forest ecosystems is of great significance for estimating ecosystem carbon budget by eddy covariance (EC). The errors in the estimation of ecosystem carbon budget caused by different methods for calculating Fs has yet not been comprehensively assessed. Using data from an open-path EC system and an eight-level CO2/H2O profile system (AP100, Campbell Scientific Inc., USA) in a broadleaved deciduous forest at the Maoer-shan in 2018, we evaluated the methodological effect of Fs[2-min mean profile (P2 min), 30-min mean profile (P30 min) and 30-min mean EC single point (Ps)] on the estimation of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration (Re), and gross primary productivity (GPP). The results showed that the impact of Fs methods on forest carbon flux generally increased with the increases of time scale, indicating that gap-filling of flux data would further amplify the impacts of Fs estimation methods. At the annual scale, NEE based on P2 min and Ps methods were 36.3% and 29.4% lower than that based on P30 min, while Re based on P2 min was higher than that based on P30 min and Ps by 8.7%. The GPP based on P2 min was 5.4% higher, while that based on Ps was 2.1% lower than that based on P30 min. The traditional P30 min ignored the instantaneous changes in CO2 concentration, Ps missed the changes of CO2 concentration within canopy, and thus both underestimated the actual Re. The approximately instantaneous profile (2-min mean profile) had higher temporal and spatial resolution and could more accurately estimate forest carbon budget with non-flat terrain and complex canopy structure. Our findings had great implications for solving the underestimation of forest Re and GPP as well as the overestimation of net carbon sink on complex conditions with the EC method.