Abstract

Although it is known that forestry mitigates carbon emissions to some degree, there is still a need to investigate the extent to which changes in forest management regimes affect the carbon cycle. In a climate-change scenario, forest management schemes must be optimized to maximize product supply and minimize environmental impacts. It is difficult to predict the mitigating effects of different silvicultural regimes because of differences in the growth characteristics of each species, destination of products, and industrial efficiencies. The objective of the present study was to use a modeling approach to evaluate the effects of different management regimes for fast growing species in southern temperate Europe in relation to mitigating climate change. A comprehensive study was carried out considering the C sink effect in biomass, soil and wood products, the substitutive effect of bioenergy, and particular conditions of the forest industry in southern Europe. The mechanistic CO2Fix model was parameterized for three species used in fast growing plantations in southern Europe: Eucalyptus globulus, Eucalyptus nitens, and Pinus radiata. Data from 120 plots covering the complete age range observed for each species were used to calculate changes in C stocks in aboveground biomass and organic and mineral soil and to validate the parameterized model for these conditions. Additional information about the efficiency of forest industry processes in the region was also considered. A strong bias in soil organic carbon estimation was observed and attributed to overestimations in the decomposition rates of soil compartments. Slight bias was also observed in the carbon biomass estimation when forest-specific yield models were used to simulate afforestation over former pastureland. As regards the model sensitivity, the Yasso model was strongly robust to turnover of leaves, roots, and branches. The chip wood production alternative yielded higher carbon stock in biomass and products, as well as in bioenergy substitution effect, than the sawn wood production alternative. Nevertheless, the sawn wood alternative was the most effective as regards the C stock in the soil. Site index had an important effect for all species, alternatives, and compartments, and mitigating effects increased with site index. Harvesting of clearcutting and thinning slash for bioenergy use led to a slight decrease in the soil carbon equilibrium but significantly increased the mitigation effect through bioenergy use.

Highlights

  • The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has recognized the importance of forestry plantations for mitigating greenhouse gases, as well as the need to monitor, preserve, and enhance terrestrial carbon stocks

  • The present results showed that changes in land use have a greater impact on biomass carbon stock than on soil stock, as reported by other authors (Jandl et al 2007; de Wit et al 2006), soil C is more stable than biomass C

  • The CO2Fix model was parameterized for fast growing tree plantations with E. globulus, E. nitens, and P. radiata established over former pastureland

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has recognized the importance of forestry plantations for mitigating greenhouse gases, as well as the need to monitor, preserve, and enhance terrestrial carbon stocks. The Kyoto Protocol (UNFCCC 1997) recognizes two main alternatives for emissions compensation in the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) sector for Annex I countries, depending on whether actions took place in their own territory (Art. 3.3, 3.4, and 6) or in other non-Annex I countries (Art. 12). For actions inside their own borders, the Kyoto Protocol (KP) allows countries included in Annex I the following activities for compliance with the KP (UNFCCC 1997, UNFCCC 2001): compensation of greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions through removal from direct human-induced land-use change and forestry activities, limited to afforestation, reforestation and deforestation since 1990 (Art. 3.3), and forest management activities (Art. 3.4). Options for enhancement and maintenance of carbon sequestration are reducing deforestation, expanding forest areas, increasing the carbon stock in existing forests (including soils), increasing the use and lifespan of wood products, and using wood products as biofuels for substituting fossil fuels (Kauppi et al 2001; Nabuurs and Schelhaas 2002)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call