Abstract

At present, 69 families of carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) have been isolated by statistically significant differences in the amino acid sequences (primary structures) of their members, with most members of different families showing little if any homology. On the other hand, members of the same family have primary and tertiary (three-dimensional) structures that can be computationally aligned, suggesting that they are descended from common protein ancestors. Members of the large majority of CBM families are β-sandwiches. This raises the question of whether members of different families are descended from distant common ancestors, and therefore are members of the same tribe. We have attacked this problem by attempting to computationally superimpose tertiary structure representatives of each of the 53 CBM families that have members with known tertiary structures. When successful, we have aligned locations of secondary structure elements and determined root mean square deviations and percentages of similarity between adjacent amino acid residues in structures from similar families. Further criteria leading to tribal membership are amino acid chain lengths and bound ligands. These considerations have led us to assign 27 families to nine tribes. Eight of the tribes have members with β-sandwich structures, while the ninth is composed of structures with β-trefoils.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.