Carbetocin versus oxytocin to reduce additional uterotonic use at non-elective caesarean section: a double-blind, randomised trial

Abstract

Objective: We compared the efficacy of Carbetocin (long-acting oxytocin receptor agonist) versus Oxytocin given at non-elective caesarean section.Method: We performed a double-blind, randomised, single-centre study. Eligible women were ≥37 weeks of gestation undergoing emergency caesarean section. Participants received either carbetocin of 100 μg or oxytocin 5 international units. The primary outcome was the need to administer additional uterotonics, as determined by the clinician. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, haemoglobin drop pre–post operation and the need for a blood transfusionResults: From August 2012 to February 2013, 114 women were enroled. Two were excluded from analysis as they received a general anaesthetic. Fifty-nine patients received 100-μg carbetocin; 53 received 5 international units oxytocin. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of women requiring additional uterotonics between the two groups: Carbetocin group 22% and Oxytocin group 13% (p = 0.323). There were no significant differences in the fall in haemoglobin, estimated blood loss, rates of post-partum haemorrhage or blood transfusions.Conclusion: Oxytocin and carbetocin have similar requirements for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, haemoglobin drop and blood transfusions. There was a trend towards requiring additional uterotonics in patients receiving Carbetocin which was not statistically significant. This study found no benefits in using carbetocin over oxytocin.