Abstract

PURPOSE: Analyze residents' perception on ophthalmology training in Brazil by classifying the quality of attendings' supervision.Also, identify areas that need better investment. METHODS: This was a descriptive and transversal study that analyzed residents' opinion about Brazilian institutions accredited by the Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC) or by the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO) or by both.A multiple-choice survey was applied to 107 residents to evaluate attendings' (clinical, surgical and in the emergency room) supervision, and the need of improvement in different areas such as, curriculum, amount/quality of surgical procedures, wetlabs and infrastructure. RESULTS: Twenty-six residents (24.3%) were from institutions accredited by MEC, 25 (23.4%) by CBO, and 56 (52.3%) by both, MEC and CBO. Attendings' supervision quality was considered satisfactory during surgeries (86,0%), clinical examinations (87,0%) and in the emergency room (67.3%). Full-time supervision was present in these departments in 55.1%, 56.1%, and 36.4%, respectively.Wetlabs, resources, equipments, and physical facilities were pointed as areas that need investment in 75.7%, 63.6%, 74.8%, and 67.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed no statistical relevance between the different institutions' accreditation and the variables analyzed. In general, direct supervision in Brazilian institutions is satisfactory, although many are not full-time. Residents suggested increasing the number of surgeries and wetlabs, and investing in the institutions' infrastructure.

Highlights

  • Analyze residents’ perception on ophthalmology training in Brazil by classifying the quality of attendings’ supervision

  • Twenty-six residents (24.3%) were from institutions accredited by Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC), 25 (23.4%) by Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia (CBO), and 56 (52.3%) by both, MEC and CBO

  • Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante de frequência dos alunos credenciados pelo CBO, MEC e CBO e MEC em relação a presença de preceptoria clínica, em todos os turnos e a sua qualidade

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Analyze residents’ perception on ophthalmology training in Brazil by classifying the quality of attendings’ supervision. O questionário era composto de 22 perguntas com dados de identificação (idade, instituição onde cursava a pós-graduação, credenciamento da instituição, localização); avaliação quantitativa e qualitativa concernentes à percepção dos alunos quanto às preceptorias (clínica, cirúrgica e emergência oftalmológica) nas instituições; necessidades de melhoria curricular; aulas teóricas; cirurgias experimentais; atividades cirúrgicas; e infraestrutura (biblioteca/internet, equipamentos e instalações físicas).

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.