Abstract

Forest management practices and droughts affect the assemblages of carabid species, and these are the most important factors in terms of influencing short- and long-term population changes. During 2017 and 2018, the occurrences and seasonal dynamics of five carabid species (Carabus coriaceus, C. ulrichii, C. violaceus, C. nemoralis and C. scheidleri) in four oak hornbeam forest stands were evaluated using the method of pitfall trapping. The climate water balance values were cumulatively calculated here as cumulative water balance in monthly steps. The cumulative water balance was used to identify the onset and duration of drought. The number of Carabus species individuals was more than three times higher in 2018 than in 2017. Spring activity was influenced by temperature. The extremely warm April in 2018 accelerated spring population dynamics; however, low night temperatures in April in 2017 slowed the spring activity of nocturnal species. Drought negatively influenced population abundance, and the effect of a drought is likely to be expressed with a two-year delay. In our investigation, a drought in 2015 started in May and lasted eight months; however, the drought was not recorded in 2016, and 2016 was evaluated as a humid year. The meteorological conditions in the year influenced seasonal activity patterns and the timings of peaks of abundance for both spring breeding and autumn breeding Carabus species.

Highlights

  • Ground dwelling invertebrates such as carabid beetles and spiders are often surveyed with respect of ecosystem changes

  • The Carabus species populations observed in the oak-hornbeam forest considered here over two years showed large differences in terms of both the abundance and seasonal activity

  • Spring activity was influenced by temperature, influencing the onset and the dynamics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ground dwelling invertebrates such as carabid beetles and spiders are often surveyed with respect of ecosystem changes These invertebrates have strong potential as ecological indicators, as they are readily surveyed in sufficient numbers for meaningful conclusions to be drawn, have a stable taxonomy, and, at least in the case of ground beetles, are readily identified. They are, for example, good local scale indicators of ecosystem disturbance in forested landscapes at both the short- and long-term time scales, responding to clear-cut logging and fire differently [1].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call