Abstract

Background and Aims: The safety of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) insufflation has not been fully established for esophageal and gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) under deep sedation, because CO<sub>2</sub> retention is not only caused by CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation but also by the sedation level and the patient’s respiratory status. To clarify the clinical safety of CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation, we conducted a crossover trial of air and CO<sub>2</sub> insufflations. Methods: A total of 60 patients with early esophageal or gastric cancers underwent ESD during which insufflation was switched from CO<sub>2</sub> to air or from air to CO<sub>2</sub>; transcutaneous partial pressure CO<sub>2</sub> (PtcCO<sub>2</sub>) was monitored in all patients. We also assessed respiratory function, arterial blood gas analysis, and smoking history. Results: Although significant increases in PtcCO<sub>2</sub> from baseline were observed, there were no significant differences in PtcCO<sub>2</sub> levels during CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation compared with levels during air insufflation in groups that received CO<sub>2</sub> preceding air or air preceding CO<sub>2</sub>. All patients underwent ESD safely without adverse events, including 20 patients with subclinical respiratory dysfunction. The sedation protocol was the only significant predictor of CO<sub>2</sub> retention, independent of CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation. Conclusions: CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation can be used as safely as air insufflation during ESD under deep sedation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call