Abstract
The method chosen for financing mental health care has profound implications for how that care will be delivered. Fee-for-service methods of reimbursement impede the implementation of certain essential program components. Capitation financing, in contrast, holds the promise of promoting an integrated system of care for chronic mental patients. The authors present data from a case management program that incorporates capitation financing. Discussion focuses on factors that planners need to consider when instituting a capitated financing system.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have