Abstract
This study analyzes the development of patterns of collective industrial protest among three different groups of mid-nineteenth-century French workers-the household Weavers of St.-Etienne, the handicraft artisans of Toulouse, and the textile factory workers of Rouen. Temporal and spatial differences in the incidence, forms, targets, and content of industrial protest are explained in terms of the way in which divergent local patterns of capitalist industrialization intersected with national-level political changes to alter workers' interests/grievances and capacities. The research documents a disjuncture between the conditions within which interest polarization between labor and capital was sharpest and the conditions under which capacities for collective industrial protest were strongest. Although full-scale proletarianization did create an intense polarization of interests between workers and employers, it did not produce the strongest capacities for collective action because such capacities were not narrowly rooted in production. They were shaped by other factors, including the persistence of preexisting traditional communities, labor market vulnerability, and the changing political opportunity structure, which are not reducible to the development of productive forces.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.