Abstract

In this paper, we theoretically analyze the capital misallocation effect of financial repression---namely, a regulation to provide cheap loans to (public) firms, in less-developed economies. Limited contract enforcement and asymmetric information between lenders and borrowers are the features of the environment we study. We show raising the interest rate does not screen low-productive firms; due to adverse selection such firms borrow and strategically default. Hence, financial repression does not cause capital misallocation. Advanced enforceability of financial contracts and/or a rise in asset collateralizability of firms break the neutrality result, in which case the free market outcome achieves the optimal allocation of capital.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call