Abstract
Bernanke (2005) hypothesized that a "global savings glut" was causing large trade imbalances. However, we show that the global savings rates did not show a robust upward trend during the relevant period. Moreover, if there had been a global savings glut there should have been a large investment boom in the countries that imported capital. Instead, those countries experienced consumption booms. National asset bubbles explain the international imbalances. The bubbles raised consumption, resulting in large trade deficits. In a sample of 18 OECD countries plus China, movements in home prices alone explain half of the variation in trade deficits.
Highlights
We show that the global savings rates did not show a robust upward trend during the relevant period
Source:FederalReserveBoardPeakDate 2008:1 2007:4 2008:1 2007:1 2007:4 2007:4 nobubble 2006:3 2007:4 nobubble 2007:1 2008:1 2007:3 2007:3 2007:3 2007:4 nobubble 2007:4 2006:4
Summary
Consumption booms and asset bubbles: a behavioural alternative to the Savings Glut Hypothesis.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
