Abstract
Despite the well-documented mixed results of hedging on firm value, empirical evidence of why hedging reduces firm value is rare. Theory suggests that hedging can increase firm value by reducing bankruptcy cost and volatility, although it can also decrease firm value through a manager’s utility maximization. This study explores the reduction of market dependence and the over-investment hypothesis that results in decreasing firm value. By studying UK domiciled oil and gas companies, we found that capital expenditure accompanied by hedging reduces firm value, although capital expenditure itself increases firm value. This effect is pronounced when capital expenditure is made by firms with foreign operations, suggesting that hedging reduces the effect of the market’s monitoring role and, therefore, capital expenditure with hedging tends to be perceived as over-investment. This paper is one of the first studies that empirically examine the reduction of market dependence and over-investment through hedging.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.