Abstract

This paper studies the relation between the evolution of capital controls and electoral cycles. We exploit a dataset containing detailed information on the level of restrictions on capital flows for 98 countries on an annual base from 1995 to 2015, constructed by Fernandez et al. (2016). First, we find that restrictions are more likely to increase during an election year. Elections prove to be more closely related to changes in capital controls than any economic variable. Second, these changes are driven predominantly by restrictions on capital outflows and on relatively liquid asset categories. Third, changes occur mostly after elections, though not exclusively. Finally, capital controls increase by more if the new government is more leftist or less liberal than its predecessor, and more electoral uncertainty is related to higher restrictions on capital flows. Overall, these results suggests that theories examining the cyclical properties of capital controls should also consider electoral cycles.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.