Abstract
SummaryMany experimental studies have investigated smart water and low-salinity waterflooding and observed significant incremental oil recovery after changes in the injected-brine composition. The common approach to model such enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) mechanisms is by shifting the input relative permeability curves, particularly including a reduction of the residual oil saturation. Cores that originally display oil-wetness can retain much oil at the outlet of the flooded core because of the capillary pressure being zero at a high oil saturation. This end effect is difficult to overcome in highly permeable cores at typical laboratory rates. Injecting a brine that changes the wetting state to less-oil-wet conditions (represented by zero capillary pressure at a lower oil saturation) will lead to a release of oil previously trapped at the outlet. Although this is chemically induced incremental oil, it represents a reduction of remaining oil saturation, not necessarily of residual oil saturation.This paper illustrates the mentioned issues of interpreting the difference in remaining and residual oil saturation during chemical EOR and hence the evaluation of potential smart water effects. We present a mathematical model representing coreflooding that accounts for wettability changes caused by changes in the injected composition. For purpose of illustration, this is performed in terms of adsorption of a wettability-alteration (WA) component coupled to the shifting of relative permeability curves and capillary pressure curves. The model is parameterized in accordance with experimental data by matching brine-dependent saturation functions to experiments where wettability alteration takes place dynamically because of the changing of one chemical component. It is seen that several effects can give an apparent smart water effect without having any real reduction of the residual oil saturation, including changes in the mobility ratio, where the oil already flowing is pushed more efficiently, and the magnitude of capillary end effects can be reduced because of increased water-wetness or because of a reduction in water relative permeability giving a greater viscous drag on the oil.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.