Abstract
This paper investigates the efficiency of Gini’s mean difference (GMD) as a measure of variability in two commonly used process capability indices (PCIs), i.e., Cp and Cpk. A comparison has been carried out to evaluate the performance of GMD-based PCIs and Pearn and Chen quantile-based PCIs under low, moderate, and high asymmetry using Weibull distribution. The simulation results, under low and moderate asymmetric condition, indicate that GMD-based PCIs are more close to target values than quantile approach. Beside point estimation, nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals, such as standard, percentile, and bias corrected percentile with their coverage probabilities also have been calculated. Using quantile approach, bias corrected percentile (BCPB) method is more effective for both Cp and Cpk, where as in case of GMD, both BCPB and percentile bootstrap method can be used to estimate the confidence interval of Cp and Cpk, respectively.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
