Abstract
This paper examines many of the traditional measures used to admit students to tertiary study and tests their efficacy against subsequent performance. The groups involved were on‐campus and off‐campus engineering students. The conclusions were that traditional admissions criteria offer little in their ability to predict student performance in the different modes of study.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
