Cannulated screw versus Kirschner-wire fixation for Milch II lateral condyle fractures in a paediatric sawbone model: a biomechanical comparison.

Abstract

PurposeLateral condyle fractures of the humerus are common in the paediatric population, accounting for up to 20% of elbow fractures. Traditional management involves internal fixation with Kirschner (K)-wires, however, this has been associated with complications and insufficiently rigid fixation. Recently, cannulated screws have been proposed as a more stable method of fixation. While cannulated screws have been thought to allow earlier range of movement and shorten time to union, data regarding the biomechanical performance and optimal screw placement is scarce. We hypothesize that cannulated screw fixation is superior to K-wire fixation and screw placement can enhance the stability of the construct.MethodsPaediatric humerus sawbones with Milch II fractures were fixed with one of three methods. Fractures were reduced with either a single cannulated screw either through the centre of the capitellum (oblique), or placed up the lateral column across the growth plate (lateral), or fixed with two K-wires. Fixed sawbone fractures were then mechanically tested in two directions simulating in vivo forces.ResultsThe lateral screw construct had a higher maximum force to failure, higher stiffness and absorbed higher energy as compared with the K-wire fixation and oblique screw under an anterior force. When loaded from the posterior direction, only the lateral column screw was better than K-wire fixation.ConclusionsScrew fixation is a biomechanically effective alternative to K-wire fixation, especially when placed up the lateral column of the distal humerus. Further clinical studies are required before transcapitellar screw fixation can be adopted.