Abstract

Since the recent legalization of medical and recreational use of cannabis (Cannabis sativa) in many regions worldwide, there has been high demand for research to improve yield and quality. With the paucity of scientific literature on the topic, this study investigated the relationships between light intensity (LI) and photosynthesis, inflorescence yield, and inflorescence quality of cannabis grown in an indoor environment. After growing vegetatively for 2 weeks under a canopy-level photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of ≈425 μmol·m−2·s−1 and an 18-h light/6-h dark photoperiod, plants were grown for 12 weeks in a 12-h light/12-h dark “flowering” photoperiod under canopy-level PPFDs ranging from 120 to 1,800 μmol·m−2·s−1 provided by light emitting diodes. Leaf light response curves varied both with localized (i.e., leaf-level) PPFD and temporally, throughout the flowering cycle. Therefore, it was concluded that the leaf light response is not a reliable predictor of whole-plant responses to LI, particularly crop yield. This may be especially evident given that dry inflorescence yield increased linearly with increasing canopy-level PPFD up to 1,800 μmol·m−2·s−1, while leaf-level photosynthesis saturated well-below 1,800 μmol·m−2·s−1. The density of the apical inflorescence and harvest index also increased linearly with increasing LI, resulting in higher-quality marketable tissues and less superfluous tissue to dispose of. There were no LI treatment effects on cannabinoid potency, while there were minor LI treatment effects on terpene potency. Commercial cannabis growers can use these light response models to determine the optimum LI for their production environment to achieve the best economic return; balancing input costs with the commercial value of their cannabis products.

Highlights

  • Drug-type Cannabis sativa is often produced indoors to allow complete control of environmental conditions, which is important for producing consistent medicinal plants and products (United Nations Office on Drugs Crime, 2019; Zheng, 2020)

  • No culture basins (CB) effects were found in any leaf photosynthesis, leaf morphology, and post-harvest parameters; CB1 and CB2 data were pooled for the development of all models except secondary metabolites, which were only measured in CB1

  • Note that the week-over-week ranges of localized foliar PPFD (LPPFD) varied as the plants progressed through their ontogeny, since self-shading from upper tissues resulted in decreases in maximum LPPFD of leaves selected for photosynthesis measurements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drug-type Cannabis sativa (i.e., genotypes grown for their high cannabinoid content; hereafter, cannabis) is often produced indoors to allow complete control of environmental conditions, which is important for producing consistent medicinal plants and products (United Nations Office on Drugs Crime, 2019; Zheng, 2020). There are many factors that govern the cost of producing photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for indoor cannabis production These factors include: the capital and maintenance costs of lighting fixtures and related infrastructure, efficiency of converting electricity into PAR (usually referred to as PAR efficacy; in units of μmol(PAR)·J−1), management of excess heat and humidity, and uniformity of PAR distribution within the plant canopy. The most common lighting technologies used for indoor cannabis production are high intensity discharge (e.g., high pressure sodium) and light emitting diodes (LED) (Mills, 2012; Evergreen Economics, 2016). These technologies have widely varying spectrum, distribution, PAR efficacy, and capital costs. Regardless of the lighting technology used, the dominant factor that regulates the cost of crop lighting is the target canopy-level light intensity (LI)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.