Abstract

We analyzed the lower and upper dentition of the family Hyaenidae along its evolutionary history from a multivariate point of view. A total of 13,103 individual measurements of the lengths and widths of canines and the main post-canine teeth (lower third and fourth premolar, lower first molar, and upper second, third, and fourth premolars) were collected for 39 extinct and extant species of this family. We analyzed these measurements using principal component analyses. The multivariate structure characterized the main groups of previously defined hyaenid ecomorphs. Strikingly, our analyses also detected differences between social hunting durophages (such as Crocuta crocuta) and solitary scavengers (such as Hyaena hyaena or Parahyaena brunnea). Concerning the hyaenid bauplan, social hunters have large carnassials and smaller canines, whereas solitary scavengers show the exact opposite morphological adaptations. Additionally, scavengers exhibited upper canines larger than lower ones, whereas hunters have upper and lower canines of similar size. It is hypothesized that sociality has led to an increase in carnassial length for hunting durophages via scramble competition at feeding. Such competition also penalizes adults from bringing food to cubs, which are consequently breastfed. On the other hand, it is also hypothesized that natural selection has led to solitary scavengers having large canines to transport carcasses to cubs. Our results indicate that these functional aspects are also better reflected by lower teeth than the upper dentition, which leads to a mosaic evolution.

Highlights

  • IntroductionCanines serve crucial functions for carnivores as weapons for attack and defense

  • Canines serve crucial functions for carnivores as weapons for attack and defense.they are involved in many other general activities such as feeding (Van Valkenburgh, 1996), or more specific roles such as tearing off a tree bark in the case of ursids (Christiansen, 2008)

  • Our results indicate that these functional aspects are better reflected by lower teeth than the upper dentition, which leads to a mosaic evolution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Canines serve crucial functions for carnivores as weapons for attack and defense They are involved in many other general activities such as feeding (Van Valkenburgh, 1996), or more specific roles such as tearing off a tree bark in the case of ursids (Christiansen, 2008). Their comparatively simple morphology makes it very difficult on many occasions to know if canines have been adapted to specific secondary functions via natural selection or if they can accomplish some roles as mere exaptations (sensu Gould & Vrba, 1982).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call