Cancer upgrades at excisional biopsy after diagnosis of atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: some reasons why.

Abstract

HomeRadiologyVol. 231, No. 3 PreviousNext EditorialsCancer Upgrades at Excisional Biopsy after Diagnosis of Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia or Lobular Carcinoma in Situ at Core-Needle Biopsy: Some Reasons WhyMichael A. CohenMichael A. CohenAuthor Affiliations1From the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Guttman Diagnostic Center, 55 Fifth Ave, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10003. Received January 26, 2004; accepted January 30. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: [email protected]).Michael A. CohenPublished Online:Jun 1 2004https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2313040154MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References 1 Foster MC, Helvie MA, Gregory NE, Rebner M, Nees AV, Paramagul C. Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary? Radiology 2004; 231:813-819. Link, Google Scholar2 Liberman L, Sama M, Susnik B, et al. Lobular carcinoma in situ at percutaneous breast biopsy: surgical biopsy findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:291-299. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Burak WE, Owens KE, Tighe MB, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 2000; 135:700-703. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Jain KS, Carter D, Lee CH. Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance. Radiology 2000; 216:831-837. Link, Google Scholar5 Berg WA, Mrose HE, Ioffe OB. Atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle breast biopsy. Radiology 2001; 218:503-509. Link, Google Scholar6 O’Driscoll D, Britton P, Bobrow L, Wishart R, Sinnatamby R, Warren R. Lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy: what is the clinical significance? Clin Radiol 2001; 56:216-220. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Shin SJ, Rosen PP. Excisional biopsy should be performed if lobular carcinoma in situ is seen on needle core biopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126:697-701. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Irfan K, Brem R. Surgical and mammographic follow-up of papillary lesions and atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed with stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Breast J 2002; 8:230-233. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Renshaw AA, Cartagena N, Derhagopian RP, Gould EW. Lobular neoplasia in breast core needle specimens is not associated with an increased risk of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 117:797-799. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Middleton LP, Shakeitha G, Stephens T, Stelling CB, Sneige N, Sahin AA. Lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy: when should it be excised? Mod Pathol 2003; 16:120-129. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Bauer VP, Ditkoff MA, Schnabel F, Brenin D, El-Tamer M, Smith S. The management of lobular neoplasia identified on percutaneous core breast biopsy. Breast J 2003; 9:4-9. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Yeh I, Dimitrov D, Otto P, Miller AR, Kahlenberg MS, Cruz A. Pathologic review of atypical hyperplasia identified by image-guided breast needle core biopsy: correlation with excision specimen. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127:49-54. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Dmytrasz K, Tartter PI, Mizrachy H, Chinitz L, Smith SR, Estabrook A. The significance of atypical lobular hyperplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy. Breast J 2003; 9:10-12. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Crisi MG, Mandavilli S, Cronin E, Ricci A. Invasive mammary carcinoma after immediate and short-term follow-up for lobular neoplasia on core biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27:325-333. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Dershaw DD. Does LCIS or ALH without other high-risk lesions diagnosed on core biopsy require surgical excision? Breast J 2003; 9:1-3. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Rosen PP. Lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia In: Rosen’s breast pathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001; 581-626. Google Scholar17 Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OMB. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:1405-1407. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18 Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002; 224:548-554. Link, Google Scholar19 Dershaw DD, Caravella BA, Liberman L. Limitations and complications in the utilization of stereotaxic core breast biopsy. Breast J 1996; 2:13-17. Crossref, Google Scholar20 Rosenfeld I, Tartter PI, Gajdos C, Hermann G, Bleiweiss I. The significance of malignancies incidental to microcalcifications in breast spot localization biopsy specimens. Am J Surg 2001; 182:1-5. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Fisher ER, Costantino J, Fisher B, et al. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) Protocol B-17: 5 year observations concerning lobular carcinoma in situ. Cancer 1996; 78:1403-1416. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Georgian-Smith D, Lawton TJ. Calcifications of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1255-1259. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Eusebi V, Magaalhaes F, Azzopardi JG. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: an aggressive tumor showing apocrine differentiation. Hum Pathol 1992; 23:655-662. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar24 Bentz JS, Yassa N, Clayton F. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathologic features of 12 cases. Mod Pathol 1998; 11:814-822. Medline, Google Scholar25 Sapino A, Frigerio A, Peterse JL, Arisio R, Coluccia C, Bussolati G. Mammographically detected in situ lobular carcinoma of the breast. Virchows Arch 2000; 436:421-430. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Lakhani S, Zhuang Z, Sloane J, Stratton M. Loss of heterozygosity in lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Mol Pathol 1995; 48:M74-M78. Crossref, Google Scholar27 Nayar R, Zhuang Z, Merino MJ, Silverberg SG. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 11q13 in lobular lesions of the breast using tissue microdissection and polymerase chain reaction. Hum Pathol 1997; 28:277-282. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Forsti A, Louhelainen J, Soderberg M, Wijkstrom H, Hemminki K. Loss of heterozygosity in tumour-adjacent normal tissue in breast and bladder cancer. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37:1372-1380. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar29 Lakhani SR, Chaggar R, Davies S, et al. Genetic alterations in “normal” luminal and myoepithelial cells of the breast. J Pathol 1999; 189:496-503. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Slaughter DP, Southwick HW, Smejkal W. “Field cancerization” in oral stratified squamous epithelium. Cancer 1953; 6:963-968. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Braakhuis BJ, Tabor MP, Kummer JA, Leemans CR, Brakenhoff RH. A genetic explanation of Slaughter’s concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications. Cancer Res 2003; 63:1727-1730. Medline, Google Scholar32 Maluf HM, Swanson PE, Koerner FC. Solid low-grade in situ carcinoma of the breast: role of associated lesions and E-cadherin in differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25:237-244. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33 Jacobs TW, Pliss N, Kouria G, Schnitt SJ. Carcinomas in situ of the breast with indeterminate features: role of E-cadherin staining in categorization. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25:229-236. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Non-malignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26:1095-1110. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: June 2004 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByAnnals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 29, No. 3Current Breast Cancer Reports, Vol. 14, No. 3What Happens after a Diagnosis of High-Risk Breast Lesion at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy? An Observational Study of Postdiagnosis Management and Imaging AdherenceYiming Gao, Marissa Albert, Leng Leng Young Lin, Alana A. Lewin, James S. Babb, Samantha L. Heller, Linda Moy, 29 January 2018 | Radiology, Vol. 287, No. 2Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Vol. 167, No. 1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 226, No. 5JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, No. 2American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 208, No. 3Bulletin du Cancer, Vol. 103, No. 5Clinical Breast Cancer, Vol. 16, No. 6Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 59, No. 4Tumori Journal, Vol. 102, No. 2Cancer Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 3Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, Vol. 62, No. 1European Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 7Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia and Lobular Carcinoma in Situ at Core Breast Biopsy: Use of Careful Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation to Recommend Excision or ObservationKristen A. Atkins, Michael A. Cohen, Brandi Nicholson, Sandra Rao, 1 November 2013 | Radiology, Vol. 269, No. 2Cancer, Vol. 119, No. 5Academic Radiology, Vol. 20, No. 4Radiology, Vol. 269, No. 2European Journal of Inflammation, Vol. 11, No. 3Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 19, No. 10Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 19, No. 13American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 138, No. 1American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 198, No. 2American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 198, No. 2American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 198, No. 2European Radiology, Vol. 21, No. 3European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), Vol. 37, No. 4Seminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 46, No. 1Identification, Biopsy, and Treatment of Poorly Understood Premalignant, in Situ, and Indolent Low-Grade Cancers: Are We Becoming Victims of Our Own Success?1Ferris M. Hall, 8 February 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 254, No. 3Diagnostic Histopathology, Vol. 16, No. 7Modern Pathology, Vol. 23, No. S2American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Vol. 34, No. 6Breast Cancer, Vol. 16, No. 4Surgical Pathology Clinics, Vol. 2, No. 2Pathology, Vol. 41, No. 1Virchows Archiv, Vol. 452, No. 5The Breast, Vol. 17, No. 6Modern Pathology, Vol. 21, No. 10The American Surgeon, Vol. 74, No. 2American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 190, No. 3Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 132, No. 6Breast Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2The Breast, Vol. 16, No. 5Seminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 42, No. 4The Breast Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1Journal de Radiologie, Vol. 87, No. 3European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 57, No. 1American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 126, No. 2American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 187, No. 4Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 4American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 184, No. 6Recommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 231, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download