Abstract

Oxaliplatin (OX) chemotherapy can lead to long-term sensorimotor impairments in cancer survivors. The impairments are often thought to be caused by OX-induced progressive degeneration of sensory afferents known as length-dependent dying-back sensory neuropathy. However, recent preclinical work has identified functional defects in the encoding of muscle proprioceptors and in motoneuron firing. These functional defects in the proprioceptive sensorimotor circuitry could readily impair muscle stretch reflexes, a fundamental building block of motor coordination. Given that muscle proprioceptors are distributed throughout skeletal muscle, defects in stretch reflexes could be widespread, including in the proximal region where dying-back sensory neuropathy is less prominent. All previous investigations on chemotherapy-related reflex changes focused on distal joints, leading to results that could be influenced by dying-back sensory neuropathy rather than more specific changes to sensorimotor circuitry. Our study extends this earlier work by quantifying stretch reflexes in the shoulder muscles in 16 cancer survivors and 16 healthy controls. Conduction studies of the sensory nerves in hand were completed to detect distal sensory neuropathy. We found no significant differences in the short-latency stretch reflexes (amplitude and latency) of the shoulder muscles between cancer survivors and healthy controls, contrasting with the expected differences based on the preclinical work. Our results may be linked to differences between the human and preclinical testing paradigms including, among many possibilities, differences in the tested limb or species. Determining the source of these differences will be important for developing a complete picture of how OX chemotherapy contributes to long-term sensorimotor impairments.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our results showed that cancer survivors after oxaliplatin (OX) treatment exhibited stretch reflexes that were comparable with age-matched healthy individuals in the proximal upper limb. The lack of OX effect might be linked to differences between the clinical and preclinical testing paradigms. These findings refine our expectations derived from the preclinical study and guide future assessments of OX effects that may have been insensitive to our measurement techniques.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call