Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy

Canagliflozin reduced kidney disease progression in participants with type 2 diabetes in the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program. This analysis explored potential mediators of the effects of canagliflozin on kidney outcomes. The percent mediating effect of 18 biomarkers indicative of disease was determined by comparing the hazard ratios for the effect of randomized treatment from an unadjusted model and from a model adjusting for the average post-randomization level of each biomarker. Multivariable analyses assessed the joint effects of biomarkers that mediated most strongly in univariable analyses. The kidney outcome was defined as a composite of 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline, end-stage kidney disease, or death due to kidney disease. Nine biomarkers (systolic blood pressure [8.9% of effect explained], urinary albumin:creatinine ratio [UACR; 23.9%], gamma glutamyltransferase [4.1%], hematocrit [51.1%], hemoglobin [41.3%], serum albumin [19.5%], erythrocytes [56.7%], serum urate [35.4%], and urine pH [7.5%]) individually mediated the effect of canagliflozin on the kidney outcome. In a parsimonious multivariable model, erythrocyte concentration, serum urate, and systolic blood pressure maximized cumulative mediation (115%). Mediating effects of UACR, but not other mediators, were highly dependent upon the baseline level of UACR: UACR mediated 42% and 7% of the effect in those with baseline UACR 30 mg/g or more and under 30 mg/g, respectively. The identified mediators support existing hypothesized mechanisms for the prevention of kidney outcomes with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Thus, the disparity in mediating effects across baseline UACR subgroups suggests that the mechanism for kidney protection with canagliflozin may vary across patient subgroups.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is one of the mayor contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated to reduce the risk of hospitalization for HF in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). We aimed to assess the risk for re-hospitalization in a cohort of patients hospitalized for HF according to whether or not they received canagliflozin at discharge, as well as changes in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) concentration during follow-up. Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study at a tertiary centre including 102 consecutive T2D patients discharged for acute HF without contraindication for SGLT2 inhibitors. We compared adverse clinical events (HF rehospitalization and cardiovascular death) and NT-ProBNP changes according to canagliflozin prescription at discharge. Results: Among the 102 patients included, 45 patients (44.1%) were prescribed canagliflozin and the remaining 57 (55.9%) were not prescribed any SGLT2 inhibitors (control group). After a median follow-up of 22 months, 45 patients (44.1%) were hospitalized for HF. Most of the rehospitalizations occurred during the first year (37.3%). HF readmission at first year occurred in 10 patients (22.2%) in the canagliflozin group and 29 patients (49.1%) in the control group (hazard ratio (HR): 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21–0.96; p < 0.039). A composite outcome of hospitalization for HF or death from cardiovascular causes was lower in the canagliflozin group (37.8%) than in the control group (70.2%) (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27–0.95; p < 0.035). Analysis of NT-ProBNP concentration showed an interaction between canagliflozin therapy and follow-up time (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Canagliflozin therapy at discharge was associated with a lower risk of readmission for HF and a reduction in NT-ProBNP concentration in patients with diabetes after hospitalization for HF.

New Glucose-Lowering Agents for Diabetic Kidney Disease.

Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Advanced Kidney Disease: Stop or Continue?

Too Many for Too Few: Finding Appropriate Nephrology Referrals for Patients With CKD That Optimize Outcomes

α-Klotho and Kidney Function Decline: An Important Step Forward in Understanding the Link Between Mineral Metabolism and Kidney Disease Progression

1216-P: The Effects of Canagliflozin on Uric Acid and Gout in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the CANVAS Program

Finerenone and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), while the relative efficacy has not been determined. The databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched for relevant cardiovascular or renal outcome trials of SGLT2i or finerenone. The end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), nonfatal stroke (NS), myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular death (CVD), and renal composite outcome (RCO). Network meta-analysis was performed using Bayesian networks to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The probability values for ranking active and placebo interventions were calculated using cumulative ranking curves. 1024 articles were searched, and only 9 studies were screened and included in this meta-analysis with 71793 randomized participants. Sotagliflozin (HR 0.72 95%CI 0.59-0.88, SUCAR=0.93) and canagliflozin (HR 0.80 95%CI 0.67-0.97, SUCAR=0.73) can significantly reduce the risk of MACE compared with placebo. Canagliflozin (HR 0.64 95%CI 0.48-0.86, SUCAR=0.73), sotagliflozin (HR 0.66 95%CI 0.50-0.87, SUCAR=0.69) and empagliflozin (HR 0.65 95%CI 0.43-0.98, SUCAR=0.68) can significantly reduce the risk of HHF compared with placebo. Empagliflozin (HR 0.62 95%CI 0.43-0.89, SUCAR=0.96) can significantly reduce the risk of CVD compared with placebo. Empagliflozin (HR 0.61 95%CI 0.39-0.96, SUCAR=0.74), canagliflozin (HR 0.66 95%CI 0.46-0.92, SUCAR=0.63), and dapagliflozin (HR 0.53 95%CI 0.32-0.85, SUCAR=0.88) can significantly reduce the risk of RCO compared with placebo. Finerenone has reduced the risk of MACE, MI, HHF, CVD and RCO to varying degrees, but they do not show significant difference from placebo and each SGLT2i. Both SGLT2i and finerenone could reduce the risk of MACE, HHF, MI, CVD, RCO. Finerenone has no obvious advantage than SGLT2i on the effects of cardiovascular and renal protective. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022375092.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a global challenge; progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with advancing nephropathy are a significant source of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure. Until recently, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade was the mainstay of pharmacotherapy in diabetic kidney disease (DKD), representing a therapeutic paradigm shift towards interventions that delay disease progression independently of antihypertensive effects. However, a significant residual risk of DKD progression persisted in patients established on RAS blockade, highlighting the need for additional treatment options. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, originally licensed as glucose-lowering agents in people with T2DM, serendipitously demonstrated beneficial renal and cardiovascular outcomes in clinical trials designed primarily to evaluate their cardiovascular safety. The Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial was the first to study the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on a primary composite renal endpoint of ESKD, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal or cardiovascular death in 4401 people with T2DM and CKD established on RAS blockade. The trial was stopped early due to efficacy, demonstrating a 30% relative risk reduction in the primary endpoint in the canagliflozin group (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.82; p = 0.00001). Through discussion of the primary analysis from CREDENCE, and selected post hoc analyses, we review the significant benefits highlighted by this landmark study, its role in shaping clinical guidelines, and in re-establishing interest in interventions that reduce the residual risk of progression of DKD, alongside its interrelation with cardiovascular morbidity and heart failure. We also provide a brief narrative summary of key renal outcome trials since CREDENCE, which indicate emerging avenues for pharmacotherapy beyond SGLT2 inhibition.

ObjectiveTo assess the effects of finerenone and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and the relative cardiovascular benefits in patients with or without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease for different outcomes with these classes of drugs.MethodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1, 2000, to December 30, 2022, to identify randomized controlled trials. The primary outcomes were the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death (MACE); hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); and a composite of renal outcomes. The results were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsIn total, we identified 11 trials and 73,927 participants, 13,847 (18.7%) in finerenone trials and 60,080 (81.3%) in GLP1-RA trials. Finerenone reduced the risk of MACE by 13% (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79–0.95; P = 0.003), while GLP1-RA reduced the risk in a similar magnitude by 13% (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83–0.92; P < 0.001). For both drug classes, the effect on lowering the risk of MACE was restricted to approximately 14% in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82–0.90; P < 0.001), whereas no effect was observed in patients without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85–1.02; P = 0.12). GLP1-RA reduced myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death more than finerenone (which appeared to have no effect). Only finerenone was beneficial for reducing the risk of HHF (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66–0.92; P = 0.003). Both finerenone (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77–0.92; P < 0.001) and GLP1-RA (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76–0.86; P < 0.001) reduced the risk of kidney disease progression, including macroalbuminuria, and finerenone was superior to GLP1-RA in delaying deterioration of kidney function.ConclusionsFinerenone and GLP1-RA lead to a risk reduction in MACE to a similar degree in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. For both drug classes, the effect on lowering the risk of progression of kidney disease was also in a similar magnitude in patients with T2DM, whereas only finerenone had a significant protective effect against HHF. Treatment decisions for patients with T2DM should consider the clinical benefit profiles of each drug.

Background:It is unclear whether there are false positive or negative results in the effects of sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on various cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to explore this issue by a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Methods:We included randomized trials evaluating the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiorenal endpoints in type 2 diabetic patients. Eight endpoints evaluated in the study were fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or nonfatal stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (CVD or HHF), all-cause death (ACD), cardiovascular death (CVD), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and kidney function progression (KFP). Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis was conducted for each endpoint.Results:Seven randomized trials of SGLT2 inhibitors were included for pooled analysis. Compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of MACE (HR 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.94), MI (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99), CVD (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79–0.93), CVD or HHF (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.73–0.82), HHF (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.62–0.74), KFP (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56–0.70), and ACD (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83–0.94), whereas SGLT2 inhibitors did not have significant effects on stroke (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88–1.09). Trial sequential analyses for MI and stroke showed that cumulative Z curve did not cross trial sequential monitoring boundary and required information size, whereas those for the other 6 endpoints showed that cumulative Z curve crossed trial sequential monitoring boundary and/or required information size.Conclusions:Compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors conclusively reduce the risk of MACE, CVD or HHF, ACD, CVD, HHF, and KFP in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on MI and stroke are not conclusive and need to be further assessed in future studies with the adequate sample size to reject or accept the effect size.

Smoking is a risk factor in the progression to kidney failure

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have shown a favorable effect on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, their efficacy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without T2DM has not yet been analyzed. To assess the cardiovascular and renal effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with CKD with and without T2DM, including all CKD patients in the current literature. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Scopus for randomized controlled trials of SGLT-2 inhibitors that evaluated cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with CKD, or trials in which these patients were a subgroup. We defined 2 primary outcomes: a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, and a composite renal outcome. For each outcome, we obtained overall hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals by using a random effects model. We included 14 randomized controlled trials. SGLT-2 inhibitors decreased the hazard for the primary cardiovascular outcome (HR 0.76; [95% CI 0.72-0.79]) and the primary renal outcome (HR 0.69; [95% CI 0.61-0.79]) in patients with CKD with or without T2DM. We did not find significant differences in the subgroup analyses according to diabetes status, baseline eGFR values or the type of SGLT-2 inhibitor used. In patients with CKD, treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors in addition to standard therapy conferred protection against cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Further research on patients with non-diabetic CKD should be done to confirm the utility of these medications in this population. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021275012).

Moderating Effects in Randomized Trials—Interpreting the P Value, Confidence Intervals, and Hazard Ratios

AimTo explore the association of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapies with cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients with established or high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).MethodsIn this cohort study, we identified T2DM patients with established or high risk of ASCVD using diagnostic codes from the institutional data of Xiamen Humanity Hospital between 2018 and 2023. Cohort 1 includes participants who were visited between 2018 and 2020, with follow-up until occurrence of an endpoint or December 31, 2020. Participants who were visited between 2018 and 2023 were included in cohort 2. A total of 5,335 patients were included in cohort 1, and 17,320 patients were included in cohort 2. Primary outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event (3-P MACE), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and end-stage kidney disease or doubling of serum creatinine level.ResultsRelative to patients’ non-use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapies, the use of at least one evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapy was associated with a lower risk of the 3-P MACE (HR, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.98), HHF (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.92) and end-stage kidney disease or doubling of the serum creatinine level (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.89) after adjustment for potential confounders. From 2018 to 2023, the use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists increased from 2.7% to 13.7%; sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors increased from 3.9% to 16.5%; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-II receptor blockers increased from 28.1% to 43.0%; moderate-intensity statins increased from 61.6% to 70.5%; and aspirin increased from 23.7% to 32.9%.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that T2DM patients with established or high risk of ASCVD might benefit from the use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive medications with respect to the risk of 3-P MACE, HHF, and end-stage kidney disease or doubling of the serum creatinine level. Despite a modest annual increase in the use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive medications in T2DM individuals with established or high risk of ASCVD, multiple strategies are needed to overcome barriers to the implementation of evidence-based therapies.