Abstract

Although evidence-informed decision-making is fundamental to public health, it is challenging in practice as there is a continual burgeoning of both evidence and emerging issues, which public health professionals need to address at local, regional and national levels. One way that Canada has addressed this perennial challenge is through its six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs). The NCCs for Public Health were created to promote and support the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practice, programs and policies in Canada. The NCCs identify knowledge gaps, foster networks across sectors and jurisdictions and provide the public health system with an array of evidence-informed resources and knowledge translation services. Each centre is hosted in academic or government organizations across Canada and focuses on a specific public health priority: Determinants of Health; Environmental Health; Healthy Public Policy; Indigenous Health; Infectious Diseases; and Knowledge Translation Methods and Tools. Since their launch in 2005, the NCCs have undergone two federal evaluations, the results of which clearly demonstrate their significant contribution to evidence-informed decision-making in public health in Canada, while identifying some opportunities for future growth. The NCCs successfully help to bridge the gaps between evidence, policy and practice and facilitate the implementation of evidence in multiple, often complex, settings.

Highlights

  • A hallmark of public health in Canada and around the world is evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) (1)

  • EIDM is fundamental to public health, it is challenging in practice

  • There is an ongoing need for knowledge translation services to make evidence accessible and useful to public health professionals and organizations as well as all levels of government to advance national public health priorities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A hallmark of public health in Canada and around the world is evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) (1). In light of the fact that new knowledge is being continuously generated, there is an ongoing need in public health to synthesize this new evidence in the context of what is already known, incorporate it into the development and implementation of policy and practice and evaluate its application to ensure the desired outcomes are achieved. EIDM is fundamental to public health, it is challenging in practice. The challenges for public health in Canada include the following: 1. 2. Not all public health professionals have the knowledge, skills, or resources to undertake knowledge syntheses and knowledge transfer activities which are adapted to the needs of decision makers situated in various contexts

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call