Abstract

BackgroundA validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs (vBCS), would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs.MethodsIn this retrospective study, photographs taken before and after weight loss from 155 overweight and obese dogs attending a weight management referral clinic were used in designing and testing the feasibility of vBCS. Observers with a range of experience examined the photographs, and estimated body condition indirectly (vBCS) using three different methods. In the first method (vBCSmeasured), the ratio of abdominal width to thoracic width (A:T) was measured, and cut-points used to determine body condition; the second method (iBCSsubjective) involved semi-quantitative examination using visual descriptors of BCS; the third (vBCSadjusted) was a combined approach whereby A:T ratio was first determined, and the final score modified if necessary after assessing photographs.ResultsWhen an experienced observer performed vBCS, there were moderate-to-good associations between body fat (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and the three vBCS methods (median Rs: 0.51-0.75; P < 0.001), and also moderate-to-substantial agreement with actual BCS (median kappa 0.51–0.63; P < 0.001). For operators with a range of experience, moderate-to-substantial agreement was generally seen between actual BCS and the scores determined by all three methods (median Kappa 0.55–0.70, P < 0.001), but the strength of agreement varied amongst observers. Age, sex, breed, coat length, and coat colour had no significant effect on vBCS (P > 0.05 for all). Compared with ideal weight and obese dogs, errors in assessing body condition were more common for overweight dogs (e.g. BCS 6–7/9, P < 0.001) by vBCSadjusted (P = 0.008), and vBCSsubjective (P = 0.021), but not by vBCSmeasured (P = 0.150). For vBCSadjusted, body condition was most often overestimated whilst, for vBCSsubjective, body condition was most often under-estimated.ConclusionsAn estimate of body condition can be obtained from an indirect assessment of photographs, but performance varies amongst observers.

Highlights

  • A validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs, would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs

  • The primary aim of the current study was to develop methods for assessing body condition indirectly from photographs, and to assess performance against body fat mass measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and body condition scoring (BCS) determined by conventional means

  • The current study has examined the feasibility of estimating BCS indirectly from photographs using three different methods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs (vBCS), would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs. Body condition scoring (BCS) is the best clinical method of assessing body composition [5, 6], with the 9-integer unit method being most widely accepted [5] With this system, the observer assesses a range of characteristics both by palpation and one limitation of conventional BCS is the need for it to be performed by an experienced observer after a hands-on assessment of the dog. If it were possible to design a system of body condition assessment that utilises visual characteristics alone, it might be feasible to develop a tool for estimating body condition remotely This would give owners reluctant to visit the veterinary clinic an easier option, and provide a tool for large-scale epidemiological surveys conducted online. A final aim was to determine the effect of a range of factors, including dog characteristics and observer experience, on the performance of vBCS methods developed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.