Abstract
The achievement of a group of undergraduate students enrolled in a pilot program for welfare recipients in the form of TANF (Temporary Aid to Needy Families) was compared with the achievement of general population students at an urban community college. Grades attained in a basic level, introductory Psychology course were used to measure academic achievement. Additionally, TANF students' rates of academic retention and election to the Dean's list were compared to rates among the general population community college students, over a period of four semesters. Students in the TANF program attained higher grades in the Psychology course, were elected to the Dean's list at higher rates, and retained their enrollments at equal rates to general population students. The findings suggest that, given proper support, TANF recipients can become successful college students. Implications for the current debate around welfare reform, specifically around the issue of allowing secondary education to substitute for TANF work requirements, are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
