Abstract

BackgroundThe main behaviour change intervention available for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients is cardiac rehabilitation. There is little recognition of what the active ingredients of behavioural interventions for CHD might be. Using a behaviour change technique (BCT) framework to code existing interventions may help to identify this. The objectives of this systematic review are to determine the effectiveness of CHD behaviour change interventions and how this may be explained by BCT content and structure.Methods and FindingsA systematic search of Medline, EMBASE and PsycInfo electronic databases was conducted over a twelve year period (2003–2015) to identify studies which reported on behaviour change interventions for CHD patients. The content of the behaviour change interventions was coded using the Coventry Aberdeen and London—Refined (CALO-RE) taxonomy. Meta-regression analyses examined the BCT content as a predictor of mortality. Twenty two papers met the criteria for this review, reporting data on 16,766 participants. The most commonly included BCTs were providing information, and goal setting. There was a small but significant effect of the interventions on smoking (risk ratio (RR) = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97). The interventions did not reduce the risk of CHD events (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.68, 1.09), but significantly reduced the risk of mortality (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.69, 0.97). Sensitivity analyses did not find that any of the BCT variables predicted mortality and the number of BCTs included in an intervention was not associated with mortality (β = -0.02, 95% CI -0.06–0.03).ConclusionsBehaviour change interventions for CHD patients appear to have a positive impact on a number of outcomes. Using an existing BCT taxonomy to code the interventions helped us to understand which were the most commonly used techniques, providing information and goal setting, but not the active components of these complex interventions.

Highlights

  • Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, for both communicable and non-communicable diseases [1]

  • Behaviour change interventions for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients appear to have a positive impact on a number of outcomes

  • This may be due to a mixed evidence base regarding individual health behaviours in secondary prevention; for example a systematic review of interventions involving reduced fat diets did not find a significant reduction in the risk of future CHD events or mortality [7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, for both communicable and non-communicable diseases [1]. There is a widespread public health campaign promoting healthy behaviour, such as physical activity, which is based upon primary prevention literature about risk factors for CHD [5]. Much of the secondary prevention guidance, such as the Quality and Outcomes Framework [6], focuses on blood pressure and cholesterol control, which can be achieved through pharmacological intervention. This may be due to a mixed evidence base regarding individual health behaviours in secondary prevention; for example a systematic review of interventions involving reduced fat diets did not find a significant reduction in the risk of future CHD events or mortality [7]. The objectives of this systematic review are to determine the effectiveness of CHD behaviour change interventions and how this may be explained by BCT content and structure

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call