Abstract
AbstractAimAnthropogenic environmental change is having a major impact on biodiversity. By identifying traits that correlate with changes in species range, comparative studies can shed light on the mechanisms driving this change; but such studies will be more useful for conservation if they have true predictive power, i.e. if their trait‐based models can be transferred to new regions. We aim to examine the ability of trait‐based models to predict changes in plant distribution across seven geographic regions that varied in terms of land cover and species composition.LocationBritain and Flanders (Belgium).MethodsWe estimated distribution change for more than 1000 species for over 70 years of data (1930s to 2004), using data from published plant atlases. We identified regional trait‐based models of plant distribution change. Traits included morphological characteristics, Ellenberg values and distribution‐based traits. The trait models were then used to predict change in all other regions, with the level of linear correlation between predicted and observed changes in range used as a measure of transferability. We then related transferability to land cover and species similarity between regions.ResultsWe found that trait correlates of range change varied regionally, highlighting the regional variation in the drivers of range change in plants. These trait models also varied in the amount of variation explained, with r2 values ranging from 0.05 to 0.17. A key cross‐regional difference was the variation in the relationship between soil nutrient association (Ellenberg N) and distribution change, which was strongly positive in Flanders and southern England but significantly negative in northern Scotland. We found that transferability between regions was significantly correlated with the level of similarity in land cover.Main conclusionsWe conclude that trait‐based models can predict broad‐scale changes in species distributions in regions that share similar land‐cover composition; however, predictions between regions with differing land‐cover cover tend to be poor.
Highlights
We found that trait correlates of range change varied regionally, highlighting the regional variation in the drivers of range change in plants
We found that transferability between regions was significantly correlated with the level of similarity in land cover
In this study we extend the predictive work of Pocock, (2011) by using a larger, high-quality dataset of the spatiotemporal distribution of plants from Flanders (Belgium) and six environmental regions in Britain to examine if the results from trait-based approaches can be used to predict change in new regions
Summary
A common goal of such studies is to help inform conservation efforts; there is little evidence of such studies directly affecting conservation practice – rather, they have acted as ‘calls to action’ highlighting the decline in biodiversity (Cardillo & Meijaard, 2011). One reason for this is that such studies explain the responses of biodiversity within their own datasets, they seldom test the predictive ability of their models in new regions (Fisher & Owens, 2004; Pocock, 2011). We aim to test whether transferability is related to similarity in land cover and/or similarity of species composition between regions in an attempt to determine if, and when, it is possible to predict change from trait-based models
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
