Abstract
The problem of equivalent models has plagued researchers since the earliest developmental stages of structural equation modeling (SEM; Marcoulides & Schumacker, 1996). Equivalent models are those that provide the same sets of statistical fit indexes (e.g., chi-square and p values) as a hypothesized model but may imply very different substantive interpretations of the data (Stelzl, 1986). As a consequence, equivalent models represent a very serious threat to behavioral and social theory development and construct validation using SEM. In fact, unless the model equivalence problem is addressed, any originally considered model—regardless of how well it fits the data—remains only one possible means of its explanation (e.g., MacCallum, Wegener, Uchino, & Fabrigar, 1993). Although the problem of equivalent models has received considerable methodological attention for more than a decade (e.g., Bollen, 1989; Breckler, 1990; Hayduk, 1996; Hershberger, 1994; Joreskog & Sorbom, 1993; Lee & STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING, 8(1), 142–149 Copyright © 2001, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.