Abstract
Research on lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic often relies on Likert-type scale question surveys. Survey participants respond to questions by selecting one of the numerically ordered choices, "Strongly Disagree"=1, "Disagree"=2, "Neutral"=3, "Agree"=4, and "Strongly Agree"=5. Analyzing Likert-type data requires statistical methods beyond approaches like linear regression. First, it is unclear if the distance between choices are truly equal. For example, are "Agree" and "Strongly Agree" more close than "Neutral" and "Agree? Second, summarizing results using traditional means makes little sense. For example, would a mean of 4.5 imply "Agree and a half"? Finally, participants tend to select more central choices and less extremes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
