Abstract
Abstract This chapter is in conversation with John Gardner’s essay ‘Can There Be a Written Constitution?’ It explores Gardner’s strategy of answering his title question by reference to HLA Hart’s secondary rules and suggests that, by doing so, his title question may best be reformulated as ‘Can the constitution of a legal system be written?’. If one instead seeks to inquire into the constitution of a state or government, Hart’s secondary rules may supply only a part of one’s materials for study. The chapter aims to highlight how Gardner makes an all-important contribution to the debate whether there is a case for the UK to move towards a written constitution. He helps us see how that very idea presupposes that there is something that can be written. To assume that everything about the UK constitution can be written is akin to thinking that the constitution of a fruit fly can be written simply because it is a constitution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
