Can Target-to-Background Ratio Measurement Lead to Detection and Accurate Quantification of Atherosclerosis With FDG PET? Likely Not.

Abstract

The introduction of FDG in 1976 started a new discipline and enhanced the role of molecular imaging in medicine. While the initial intent with this tracer was to determine brain function in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders, over time, this powerful approach has made a major impact on managing many other diseases and disorders. During the past 2 decades, FDG PET has been used to detect inflammatory lesions in the atherosclerotic plaques and in other settings. However, the suboptimal spatial resolution of PET limits its ability to visualize plaques that are very small in size. Furthermore, this tracer remains in the blood for an extended period and therefore provides suboptimal results. Target-to-background ratio (TBR) has been suggested to correct for this source of error. Unfortunately, TBR values vary substantially, depending on the timing of image acquisition. Delayed imaging at later time points (3–4 hours) may obviate the need for TBR measurement, but it is impractical with conventional PET instruments. Recently, 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) has been used for detection and quantification of molecular calcification in the plaques. This tracer is highly specific for calcification and is rapidly cleared from the circulation. In addition, global atherosclerotic burden as measured by NaF PET can be determined accurately either in the heart or major arteries throughout the body. Therefore, the role of FDG PET–based TBR measurement for detection and quantification of atherosclerotic plaques is questionable at this time.